• Multi-channel fNIRS has been used to study cortical activation and functional connectivity during a verbal fluency task in patients with chronic insomnia.1
  • The methods are relevant for neuroimaging and clinical sleep/psychiatry; primary focus is insomnia.1
  • Reported in Nature; tier-2.1 1

Weekly enrichment (2026-07-20)

  • A multi-channel fNIRS study compared 81 chronic insomnia disorder (CID) patients against 100 healthy controls during a verbal fluency task, making it one of the largest fNIRS insomnia cohorts to date.23
  • CID patients showed significantly reduced bilateral prefrontal activation (p < 0.01), most prominently in the left inferior frontal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, and superior frontal gyrus.2
  • Interregional functional connectivity was 32–45% weaker in CID patients than in controls.2
  • Left IFG activation correlated negatively with sleep latency (r = -0.32) and positively with sleep duration (r = 0.28), while right SFG activation correlated with sleep efficiency (r = 0.31).2
  • Left superior frontal gyrus activation alone gave fair-to-good discrimination between groups (ROC AUC = 0.79).2
  • A multivariate model combining all six prefrontal regions of interest raised the AUC to 0.84, and further adding behavioral performance and clinical scale scores reached AUC = 0.91.2
  • The earlier NIRS report on this cohort used general linear modeling for activation and correlation matrices for connectivity, finding hypoactivation of oxy-Hb responses in bilateral mPFC and DLPFC.3
  • The authors position fNIRS prefrontal metrics as candidate objective biomarkers for CID, most useful within a multimodal diagnostic framework rather than any single metric; broader fNIRS verbal-fluency work supports its sensitivity across psychiatric disorders.24

Footnotes

  1. https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiX0FVX3lxTE1MbHpsYUdiellpQktnUHJnZGtQREdXQjIwTGdVNktacEg3MEpPMFZYZ3c5NVNKYmozT0tRbG9hb3ZqSUtlaThBLUwyX1FPNHVfWUtWSDRRU25jUHlRM0ln?oc=5 2 3 4

  2. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-29365-9 2 3 4 5 6 7

  3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.025 2

  4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.06.015