• Implantable nanophotonic neural probes capable of both photostimulation and recording were demonstrated in vivo (1).
  • These probes support optogenetic and photonic readouts with high spatial precision (1).
  • The design is relevant to next-generation neural interfaces and optogenetic BCI applications (1). 1

Gardner updates

  • Implantable nanophotonic probes support both photostimulation and recording with high spatial precision and are relevant to next-generation neural interfaces and optogenetic BCI. 1

Deep research (2026-07-20)

  • Source note: the listed Science Advances DOI could not be independently verified during research; the bullets below draw on the directly-lineage probe paper (Mu, Chen, Sacher, Poon, Valiante et al., “Nanophotonic neural probes for in vivo photostimulation, electrophysiology, and microfluidic delivery,” Microsyst Nanoeng. 2026;12(1):100).2 3
  • Authors/institutions: Xin Mu, Fu-Der Chen, Wesley D. Sacher (corresponding), Joyce K.S. Poon, Taufik A. Valiante — Max Planck Institute of Microstructure Physics (Halle), University of Toronto, the Max Planck–University of Toronto Centre for Neural Science and Technology, Krembil Brain Institute/UHN, with foundry partner Advanced Micro Foundry (Singapore).3
  • The device integrates 16 silicon-nitride grating-coupler optical emitters, 18 titanium-nitride microelectrodes, and one embedded microfluidic channel monolithically on a single foundry-fabricated silicon probe shank.4 3
  • In vivo validation in optogenetic, blue-light-sensitive mice demonstrated simultaneous photostimulation, electrophysiological recording, and microfluidic drug delivery on the same shank.3
  • Functional demonstration: local photostimulation suppressed epileptic seizure activity that had been chemically induced via microfluidic injection of 4-aminopyridine — a closed-loop optogenetic seizure-control proof of concept.4 3
  • Fabrication is foundry-compatible (commercial Si-photonics foundry, wafer-scale), enabling scalable emitter/channel counts and manufacturing volume, distinguishing it from bespoke academic-lab microfabrication.5
  • Sample size and chronic recording duration were not reported in the retrieved abstract/summary — not reported.
  • Comparison point: earlier probes from the same lineage (Mu et al., arXiv 2023) used 3D-printed microfluidics bolted onto photonic probes rather than monolithic integration and lacked electrodes in some versions; this work advances toward full tri-modal (light + electrical + fluidic) integration on one chip.6
  • Clinical/BCI implication: monolithic multimodal probes point toward future optogenetic human BCI/neuromodulation devices capable of simultaneous stimulation, recording, and pharmacological intervention through a single minimally invasive shank, reducing tissue damage versus multiple separate devices.7 3
  • Versus Neuropixels (pure high-density electrophysiology, no optics) and micro-LED optrodes (optics + electrodes, rarely fluidics), this probe’s distinguishing feature is the integrated fluidic channel for localized delivery; whether its electrode density matches Neuropixels’ thousands of sites was not reported.
  • Chen FD, et al. “Implantable nanophotonic neural probes for integrated photostimulation and recording.” Nature portfolio, 2025.7
  • Mu X, Chen FD, Dang KM, et al. “Implantable Photonic Neural Probes with 3D-Printed Microfluidics and Applications to Uncaging.” arXiv, 2023.6
  • Lanzio V, et al. “Scalable nanophotonic neural probes for multicolor optogenetic stimulation.” 2021.8

Footnotes

  1. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adu8680 2 3 4 5

  2. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41378-026-01192-6

  3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41856990/ 2 3 4 5 6

  4. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.08.26.671930v1 2

  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13002897/

  6. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10387 2

  7. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44328-025-00024-3 2

  8. https://europepmc.org/article/med/33725677